在探讨中国现代诗歌与西方现代主义的相似之处和差异之前，我们首先需要对这两个概念有一个清晰的理解。中国现代诗歌通常指的是从20世纪初开始，随着社会的变迁、文化的发展而产生的一种新的文学形式，而西方现代主义则是指19世纪末到20世纪中叶之间，在欧洲和北美等地区兴起的一种文学运动。

两者都具有挑战传统、追求新颖性和创新性的共同特点，但具体表现却有很大的不同。

第一，语言使用上的区别。中国现代诗人作家往往会运用大量民间语言元素，如谚语、俗语、地方词汇等，以此来增强作品的情感表达力。而西方现代主义中的作家则倾向于使用更加简洁直接的手法，以减少言辞的繁复，从而突出作品内在的情感或思想。

第二，主题选择上的差异。中国modern poetry（即“七月”派）通常关注自然景物，对待自然充满了深刻的人文关怀；同时也经常反映了作者对于社会现实的问题思考。而西方modernist poets则更侧重于个人体验、心理状态以及艺术本身的探索，他们通过独特的手法去创造一种新的文学世界。

第三，形象构建方法上存在差别。在中国古典诗词中，“意境”是一个非常重要的概念，它涉及到对环境情绪的一种抽象描绘。而在西方Modernism中，则更多地采用象征手法，将具体事物赋予隐喻意义，使得读者可以从不同的层面去解读同一段文字。

第四，与传统有关联程度不同。在某些方面，China's modern poetry still has a strong connection to the traditional Chinese culture, such as the use of four-syllable lines and other poetic forms inherited from classical literature. On the contrary, Western Modernism is characterized by its rejection of many traditional literary conventions in favor of innovation and experimentation.

第五，在社会影响方面，这两大体系各有其独特的地位与作用。Chinese modern poetry often serves as a reflection of social changes and cultural transformations, while also providing solace or inspiration for readers during times of turmoil. Western Modernism, however, played an important role in shaping new aesthetic standards and challenging established norms in literature.

最后，不可忽视的是教育背景与生活经验对创作风格影响的大不相同。在Western countries like France or America, there was a significant shift towards individualism which influenced their artistic pursuits. In contrast, China experienced a series of political upheavals that had profound effects on its society and art world.

In conclusion, despite sharing some similarities with Western Modernism in terms of breaking away from tradition and seeking novelty, Chinese modern poetry has unique characteristics shaped by its own cultural context. This includes language usage that incorporates folk elements for emotional depth; themes centered around nature reflection as well as societal concerns; distinctive methods to build imagery between abstract representation (intention) vs symbolic depiction (symbol); connections to traditional forms vs rejection thereof; social impact reflecting national change; educational background influencing creative styles based on different historical experiences.

The exploration into these differences not only deepens our understanding but also enriches our appreciation for both systems’ contributions to the realm of literature worldwide.